Thanks Bret. I tried out purplexity and I have this slight fear that it sources the wikipedia for too many queries. It seems as if wikipedia is the go to source for this tool. But as you said, it did not give too many hazy or outrightly wrong answers. In fact, I asked a few questions about Sanskrit verse forms and it gave right answers. I somehow do not see purplexity as conversational to warrant a comparison with ChatGPT. ChatGPT is extremely conversational. As in, when I asked if he can help me with search, the bot said he is not connected to the internet and listed out all his limitations. It sounded like a conversation. Whereas purplexity is yet to give such a cohesive answer, although I must admit that I have not tested it extensively as I write this. Thanks for leading me to this wonderful tool.
Thanks Bret. I tried out purplexity and I have this slight fear that it sources the wikipedia for too many queries. It seems as if wikipedia is the go to source for this tool. But as you said, it did not give too many hazy or outrightly wrong answers. In fact, I asked a few questions about Sanskrit verse forms and it gave right answers. I somehow do not see purplexity as conversational to warrant a comparison with ChatGPT. ChatGPT is extremely conversational. As in, when I asked if he can help me with search, the bot said he is not connected to the internet and listed out all his limitations. It sounded like a conversation. Whereas purplexity is yet to give such a cohesive answer, although I must admit that I have not tested it extensively as I write this. Thanks for leading me to this wonderful tool.